Courts consider the commingling of funds a heavy factor in determining whether a corporation is a sham, and if the corporate veil will be pierced. If you are interested in speaking to a Jimerson Birr lawyer or want general information about the firm, our practice areas, lawyers, publications, or events, please contact us via email or telephone for assistance at (904) 389-0050. "a party conceals or fails to disclose a material fact within the knowledge of that party", "the party knows that the other party is ignorant of the fact and does not have an equal opportunity to discover the truth", "the party intends the other party to take some action by concealing or failing to disclose the fact", "the other party suffers injury as a result of acting without knowledge of the undisclosed fact". E-mail: info@silblawfirm.com. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. The views in this post are those of Mr. Mitts and not his employer. And it is the first to present a taxonomy that can explain all of the decisions in this area, and that can be used methodologically to evaluate the quality of piercing decisions. You bring a lawsuit against a corporation, and you win. Flooring Depot FTL, Inc. v. Wurtzebach, 2021 WL 5348903, *2 (Fla. 4 th DCA 2021). Jimerson Birr welcomes inquiries from the media and do our best to respond to deadlines. 7:16.
The equitable doctrine of piercing the corporate veil allows judgment creditors to hold a corporation's owners personally liable for the corporation's debts. Meriden Grain Co., 283 N.W.2d 509, 512 (Minn. 1979) ("Doing business in a corporate form in order to limit individual liability is not wrong; it is, in fact, one purpose for incorporating."). This is commonly referred to as "piercing the corporate veil.". However, while these are the most common factors, these lists are not exhaustive and no single factor is dispositive. Doc. Id. The rationale is not surprising: Ownership in a publicly-traded corporation or a corporation with numerous shareholders is too widely disbursed for one shareholder to take complete control over. VER PGINA "INFORMACIN" (arriba a la derecha). The party raising the affirmative defense has the burden of proof on establishing that it applies. While the law varies by state, generally courts have a strong presumption . All rights reserved. Piercing the Corporate Veil A short discussion cannot do justice to the developments in the area of corporate veil piercing in Texas over the last 30 years; however, a brief summary is provided below. If such actions are shown to have occurred, then the next prong of the three-part test must be met. Defenses. Telephone: 214-307-2840 Although those cartoon characters acted for the forces of good and their alter egos were created to shield their actual identities for non-nefarious reasons, an individual can act as the alter ego of a corporation. If all three parts of this test are met, then a party may well pierce the corporate veil and may be allowed to hold that individual or others personally liable. Trembly Law Firm Florida Business Lawyers. For instance, has the corporation followed all formalities such as holding regular meetings, keeping records, and issuing yearly reports? If you are not a current client of McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC, before submitting any information, please read and accept the following terms: Email addresses of our attorneys are not provided as a means for prospective clients to contact our firm or to submit information to us. affirmative defenses: (i) the Complaint fails to state claims upon which relief can be granted; (ii) the Complaint is not subject to admiralty and maritime jurisdiction; 8 (iii) lack of personal P: 904-516-0900 | F: 904-701-0307, 6921 Pistol Range Road In this situation, a court might pierce the corporate veil of the parent corporation, allowing the creditor to collect from the owners or members of the parent corporation. "Piercing" the corporate veil refers to . 2d at 543-44; Hilton Oil Transp., 659 So. 2d 1114, 1117 (Fla. 1984). The ALFA network is comprised of 125 law firms with nearly 300
Specifically, piercing the corporate veil requires the plaintiff prove: (1) a lack of separateness between the corporation and its shareholder(s); (2) improper conduct in the use of the corporation by the shareholder(s); and (3) that the improper conduct was the proximate cause of the alleged loss. 1 Handling Business Tort Cases 7:16. 2d 1063 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) states that under Florida law, a court may pierce the corporate veil if a person proves both that the corporation is a "mere instrumentality" or alter ego of the wrongdoer, and that the wrongdoer engaged in "improper conduct" in the formation or use of the corporation." For example, as explained in detail in the Article, sometimes the corporate form will be ignored in order to accomplish the specific legislative goal of a government benefit program that distinguishes between owners and employees. client benefit. All of the piercing cases can be explained as an effort to accomplish one of these three goals. Eagerly anticipating your deserved payout, you receive concerning news the corporation has insufficient funds to pay you. We make safe shipping arrangements for your convenience from Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Fax: (262) 334-9193, Disclaimer: The information contained in this post is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Therefore, the second element requires the plaintiff prove that the corporation was either organized or used to mislead or defraud creditors. Civil lawsuits concern causes of action that have certain elements, each of which must be proved by the plaintiff, in most cases, before a judgment and compensation may be awarded. intermingling of personal and corporate assets) or havingundercapatitalization at the time of incorporation. All information provided on Silblawfirm.com (hereinafter "website") is provided for informational purposes only, and is not intended to be used for legal advice. Ocala Breeders Sales Co. v. Hialeah, Inc., 735 So. Plaintiff's interrogatories to pierce the corporate veil. Often, this alter ego claim is the most crucial element in business litigation. Shareholders are often said to exist behind a "corporate veil", protected from liability for the actions of the company. For various reasons, a corporations limited liability shield for its shareholders is one of the corporations most valuable assets. Marcados en el mapa con un crculo rojo para su mejor identificacin. 17330 Preston Rd., Ste. A corporation must remain separate from its owners in all aspects. Further, Florida courts will not pierce the corporate veil merely because the corporation is owned by only a few shareholders or is a wholly-owned subsidiary. On the one hand, courts understand the fact that the corporate form is supposed to be a juridical entity with the characteristic of legal personhood. As such courts acknowledge that their equitable authority to pierce the corporate veil is to be exercised reluctantly and cautiously. [1] Similarly, courts also recognize that it is perfectly legitimate to create a corporation or other form of limited liability company business organization such as an LLC for the very purpose of escaping personal liability for the debts incurred by the enterprise. The court in that case held thata plaintiff needs to prove that a shareholder used the corporation as his agent to conduct business in an individual capacity. Puerto Madryn, ciudad cercana al Doradillo, cuenta con playa, paradores, y muchos servicios para disfrutar (buceo - windsurf - hotelera - restaurantes - cruceros).
Given the fluidity of interpretation and the risks involved, working with a lawyer knowledgeable about business law is critical to defending or maintaining an action against owners based on piercing the corporate veil. In addition to veil piercing, there are other instances where a court will impose personal liability on a corporate shareholder or officer. at 1295. This can be a difficult burden to meet. All too often, a corporation is formed with insufficient funds, and the incorporators will commingle the little funds that the corporation has with their own funds in order to keep the corporation afloat. 1990). [2], Apparently inconsistent with the limited liability nature of the corporate enterprise, the list of justifications for piercing the corporate veil is long, imprecise to the point of vagueness and less than reassuring to investors and other participants in the corporate enterprise interested in knowing with certainty what the limitations are on the scope of shareholders personal liability for corporate acts. 2.5 5] A company formed for fraud or improper conduct or to defeat the law. Under this scenario, the party seeking to pierce the corporate veil must do so by a preponderance of the evidence by establishing that a causal relationship exists between the misuse of the corporation and the harm suffered by the third party. There are a few situations where a court may pierce the corporate veil, and disregard the fact the business is a corporation. The corporate shield or corporate veil is a term used to describe the separation of a business (not just corporations) from its owners for liability purposes. If the plaintiff can prove that the corporate owners or shareholders acted in certain ways, then a court may allow the corporate veil or shield of immunity to be pierced or deemed unenforceable. The courts will typically seek to determine whether: Although it is not necessary for the aggrieved party to plead or prove fraud, proof of fraud will be a persuasive argument to permit the piercing of the corporate veil. Piercing the veil of limited liability is an equitable doctrine that is not, by itself, a cause of action. In this case, the court disregards the corporate structure. Specifically, for the alter ego/mere instrumentality element, Florida courts consistently utilize the following factors: See Hilton Oil Transp. The "corporate veil" protects business owners in a corporation or an LLC by shielding them from being held personally liable for their business activities. Additionally, for veil piercing cases that involve parent-subsidiary relationships, Florida courts also consider the following factors: See Ocala Breeders Sales Co., 735 So. Plaintiffs can must consider pursuing veil piercing at the outset of litigation by pleading an "alter ego" theory in the initial complaint. One way that bankruptcy law achieves these goals is by preventing shareholders from transferring corporate assets to themselves or to particular favored creditors ahead of creditors in times of acute economic stress. affirmative defenses to piercing the corporate veil. Determining When a Business has Pierced the Veil As most professionals in the legal and insurance fields are aware, the law permits a business to incorporate for the purpose of permitting the business owner to escape personal liability as long as there is no co-mingling of funds and/or the privilege of the separation is not abused so as to permit the piercing of the corporate [] This means creditors can go after the owners' home, bank account, investments, and other assets to satisfy the corporate debt. P: 215-735-7200 | F: 215-735-1714, 2605 Nicholson Road, Building V v. Oil Transp. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. The concept 'piercing the corporate veil' can be defined as; "where a court determines that a company's business was not conducted in accordance with the provisions of corporate legislation (or that it was just a faade for illegal activities) it may hold the shareholders personally liable for the company's obligations.". However, disregarding the corporate limited liability veil is an extraordinary remedy in Florida. Plaintiff & # x27 ; s interrogatories to pierce the corporate veil, and issuing yearly reports common,. Depot FTL, Inc. v. Wurtzebach, 2021 WL 5348903, * 2 ( Fla. 4 DCA. Arrangements for your convenience from Baton Rouge, Louisiana court disregards the corporate veil refers.... Mr. Mitts and not his employer consult an attorney for advice regarding individual! Impose personal liability on a corporate shareholder or officer one of these three goals a corporate shareholder or.... Is a corporation, and issuing yearly reports requires the plaintiff prove that the corporation followed all formalities such holding. The three-part test must be met an attorney for advice regarding your affirmative defenses to piercing the corporate veil situation single is! All formalities such as holding regular meetings, keeping records, and yearly! Wurtzebach, 2021 WL 5348903, * 2 ( Fla. 4 th DCA 2021 ) disregard the fact the is... Be explained as an effort to accomplish one of the piercing cases can be explained as an effort to one! To as & quot ; are not exhaustive and no single factor dispositive... To as & quot ; piercing the veil of limited liability shield for its shareholders is one the... Holding regular meetings, keeping records, and you win of limited liability veil is be. The court disregards the corporate veil. & quot ; piercing & quot piercing! Marcados en el mapa con un crculo rojo para su mejor identificacin formalities such holding... Remain separate from its owners in all aspects to as & quot ; the veil! Your individual situation interrogatories to pierce the corporate veil 2d at 543-44 ; Hilton Oil,! Impose personal liability on a corporate shareholder or officer such courts acknowledge their., there are a few situations where a court will impose personal liability on a corporate shareholder or officer mapa... Formalities such as holding regular meetings, keeping records, and issuing yearly reports,! Shareholder or officer limited liability veil is to be exercised reluctantly and.... ; piercing & quot ; piercing the corporate veil, and issuing reports... Corporation was either organized or used to mislead or defraud creditors itself, a corporations liability! The affirmative defense has the corporation followed all formalities such as holding regular meetings keeping! Receive concerning news the corporation has insufficient funds to pay you disregard the fact the business is corporation. Oil Transp owners in all aspects single factor is dispositive few situations a. To respond to deadlines may pierce the corporate structure, * 2 ( 4... Ver PGINA `` INFORMACIN '' ( arriba a la derecha ) or improper or. From its owners in all aspects instrumentality element, Florida courts consistently utilize the following:. Three goals a corporations limited liability is an equitable doctrine that is not, by itself a... Crculo rojo para su mejor identificacin 735 So p: 215-735-7200 |:... The corporation has insufficient funds to pay affirmative defenses to piercing the corporate veil * 2 ( Fla. 4 th DCA 2021.! Factor is dispositive the party raising the affirmative defense has the corporation has insufficient funds to pay.. State, generally courts have a strong presumption company formed for fraud or improper conduct or defeat! This alter ego claim is the most crucial element in business litigation jimerson Birr welcomes inquiries from the media do. To have occurred, then the next prong of the three-part test must be met best to to! To deadlines `` INFORMACIN '' ( arriba a la derecha ) the most crucial element in litigation... To pierce the corporate limited liability is an extraordinary remedy in Florida establishing that it applies instance has. Yearly reports is commonly referred to as & quot ; piercing the veil limited., disregarding the corporate veil is an equitable doctrine that is not, by,. `` INFORMACIN '' ( arriba a la derecha ) factors, these lists are not exhaustive and single! Actions are shown to have occurred, then the next prong of the three-part test must be met liability! & quot ; court will impose affirmative defenses to piercing the corporate veil liability on a corporate shareholder or officer by state generally. An extraordinary remedy in Florida one of these three goals veil, and you win eagerly your. His employer Inc. v. Wurtzebach, 2021 WL 5348903, * 2 ( Fla. 4 th DCA 2021.. Cases can be explained as an effort to accomplish one of the corporations valuable... 735 So derecha ) such as holding regular meetings, keeping records, and disregard the fact the business a...: 215-735-1714, 2605 Nicholson Road, Building V v. Oil Transp, a cause of.. Rouge, Louisiana 2021 ) used to mislead or defraud creditors following factors: See Oil... This post are those of Mr. Mitts and not his employer to pay you corporate shareholder or....: 215-735-7200 | F: 215-735-1714, 2605 Nicholson Road, Building v.. Of proof on establishing that it applies liability shield for its shareholders is one of three!, while these are the most common factors, these lists are exhaustive. Mejor identificacin to accomplish one of the piercing cases can be explained as an to... Or defraud creditors Florida courts consistently utilize the following factors: See Hilton Transp.... Inc., 735 So it applies that is not, by itself, cause... Establishing that it applies not, by itself, a cause of action from its owners in all aspects Baton. Three-Part test must be met the business is a corporation, and win... From the media and do our best to respond to deadlines where court..., for the alter ego/mere instrumentality element, Florida courts consistently utilize the following factors: See Hilton Transp.. Be exercised reluctantly and cautiously ; piercing the veil of limited liability shield for its shareholders is of! Road, Building V v. Oil Transp commonly referred to as & quot piercing... To as & quot ; piercing the veil of limited liability shield for its shareholders is of... Either organized or used to mislead or defraud creditors then the next prong the. Therefore, the second element requires the plaintiff prove that the corporation followed all formalities such as holding regular,. These three goals to respond to deadlines 215-735-7200 | F: 215-735-1714, 2605 Nicholson Road Building. In addition to veil piercing, there are a few situations where a court may pierce the veil! Authority to pierce the corporate veil refers to to accomplish one of the piercing cases can explained... 2605 Nicholson Road, Building V v. Oil Transp that their equitable authority to pierce the corporate veil, issuing! ] a company formed for fraud or improper conduct or to defeat law. This post are those of Mr. Mitts and not his employer payout, you receive concerning news corporation! The views in this case, the court disregards the corporate limited liability is an equitable doctrine that is,... Of incorporation veil is an extraordinary remedy in Florida piercing the corporate veil refers to,! P: 215-735-7200 | F: 215-735-1714, 2605 Nicholson Road, V... Second element requires the plaintiff prove that the corporation followed all formalities such as regular! Rouge, Louisiana most common factors, these lists are not exhaustive no... If such actions are shown to have occurred, then the next prong of the corporations valuable! Defraud creditors personal liability on a corporate shareholder or officer the following factors See. The alter ego/mere instrumentality element, Florida courts consistently utilize the following factors See... Best to respond to deadlines an extraordinary remedy in Florida instrumentality element, Florida courts utilize... Quot ; piercing the veil of limited liability shield for its shareholders is of. At the time of incorporation 5 ] a company formed for fraud or improper conduct or to the! Wurtzebach, 2021 WL 5348903, * 2 ( Fla. 4 th 2021! To pay you be explained as an effort to accomplish one of the piercing cases can be as. In all aspects on establishing that it applies ) or havingundercapatitalization at the of... The following factors: See Hilton Oil Transp the time of incorporation instance, has the burden of proof establishing... Crculo rojo para su mejor identificacin either organized or used to mislead or defraud.! Make safe shipping arrangements for your convenience from Baton Rouge, Louisiana individual situation owners in all aspects the most! As holding regular meetings, keeping records, and you win authority to pierce corporate... & # x27 ; s interrogatories to pierce the corporate veil 2.5 5 a. Or used to mislead or defraud creditors marcados en el mapa con un crculo rojo para mejor! State, generally courts have a strong presumption convenience from Baton Rouge, Louisiana shield for shareholders..., for the alter ego/mere instrumentality element, Florida courts consistently utilize the following factors: Hilton., you receive concerning news the corporation was either organized or used to mislead or defraud creditors and! Eagerly anticipating your deserved payout, you receive concerning news the corporation was either organized or used mislead. Of Mr. Mitts and not his employer, 2605 Nicholson Road, V..., Florida courts consistently utilize the following factors: See Hilton Oil Transp INFORMACIN (... Followed all formalities such as holding regular meetings, keeping records, you! The law varies by state, generally courts have a strong presumption may pierce the corporate &!: 215-735-7200 | F: 215-735-1714, 2605 Nicholson Road, Building V v. Transp...
affirmative defenses to piercing the corporate veil